Links To Healthcare Bills & Dodd-Frank Bill, Plus Information on Capital Gains and Dividend Tax Rate Changes

If you were looking for the actual texts of the healthcare and Wall St. reform bills, I've attached links to these acts below.

You might also be interested in understanding how long term capital gains tax rates are expected to increase over the next several years.

First, at the end of this year, the long term capital gains tax rate of 15% is set to go to 20%.

In addition, effective January 1, 2013, for individuals earning over $200,000 a year (and $250,000 for married couples), there will be an additional 3.8% tax imposed on investment income. Investment income includes interest, dividends, royalties, rents, and capital gains. (You can find this new rule in Section 1402 of P.L. 111-152.)

Dividend rates are set to move at the end of this year from 15% to ordinary income tax rates, which will be as high as 39.6%, unless Congress acts.

See also the Technical Explanation of the Revenue Provisions of the Reconciliation Act of 2010, as amended, in Combination with the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act", prepared by the Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, starting on page 141.

 

New Proposed S Corporation Tax Bill Revised

As I blogged last week, Congress is considering taking away the employment tax benefits of being an S corporation for certain small professional services businesses.

The first bill that was proposed targeted S corporations engaged in professional service businesses if the principal asset of such businesses was the reputation and skill of 3 or fewer employees. This bill gave rise to some hue and cry over what these concepts meant. The charge was that these provisions were too vague to be readily interpretable.

Senator Baucus has now proposed that this language be changed to target S corporations engaged in professional services businesses if 80 percent or more of the gross income of such businesses is attributable to the service of 3 or fewer shareholders. So, Senator Baucus's amendment removes the concepts of "principal asset," "reputation and skill," of "employees," and substitutes for those concepts "80 percent or more of the gross income" "attributable" to "3 or fewer shareholders."

 A redline of all of the initial proposal against the new proposal is here.

Old Concepts New Concepts
principal asset 80% or more of gross income
reputation and skill attributable
3 or fewer employees 3 or fewer shareholders

The Senate Finance Committee described the changes this way:

Changes to Employment Taxes on Earning of Certain Service Professionals.  Social Security taxes are imposed on compensation and self-employment income up to the Social Security Wage Base (currently $106,800) and the Medicare tax is imposed on all self-employment and compensation income. Some service professionals have been avoiding Medicare and Social Security taxes by routing their self-employment income through an S corporation. These taxpayers then pay themselves a nominal salary and take the position that the remaining earnings are exempt from employment taxes. A provision passed by the House and included in the original Baucus substitute would address this abuse in situations where (1) an S corporation is a partner in a professional service business or (2) an S corporation is engaged in a professional service business that is principally based on the reputation and skill of 3 or fewer individuals.   This provision does not change the ability of S corporations to use some income to make business investments or deduct those small business investments.  To make the second alternative more administrable and more targeted, this amendment changes the language so that the policy applies only if 80 percent or more of the professional service income of the corporation is attributable to the services of 3 or fewer owners of the corporation.  This proposal, as amended, is estimated to raise $9.15 billion over 10 years.  

These are welcome changes from a clarity point of view, but these tax provisions are still problematic because they are targeting the smallest companies in America. Why are S corporations 80% or more the gross income of which is attributable to the services of 3 or fewer shareholders being targeted for increased taxes? Why not broad-based employment tax law changes? Evidently the desire and/or need for revenue trumps treating small businesses the same as larger businesses.

These opinions are my own.

House Passes 100% Exclusion On Sales of Certain Qualified Small Business Stock

Today the House passed a bill which would completely exempt from capital gains taxes (subject to per taxpayer limitations) the gain on the sale of qualified small business stock held for more than 5 years, if such stock was purchased after March 15, 2010, and before January 1, 2012. It is unclear if the Senate will pass this bill. The bill also makes clear that no part of the exclusion is an alternative minimum tax adjustment. The provision as passed by the House is quoted below.

For press coverage, see The Hills' coverage.

If the Senate passes this provision, a lot more intensity will be brought to bear on representations and warranties in stock purchase agreements that stock being purchased qualifies as "qualified small business stock." In addition, special scrutiny will be brought to bear on redemptions and other historical transactions which could disqualify stock from qualifying.

As I've indicated before, I think that the short window in which this 100% exclusion is actually available makes it sort of a gimmick. It seems to me that only individual investors who would otherwise have been likely to invest in qualifying companies during this window already will be the ultimate beneficiaries of this provision. So, think of it like a bailout in a sense for taxpayers in that spot. If Congress really wanted to shift behavior, it would enact permanent tax reductions of some kind related to investments--not short term gimmicks and ploys. Still, for qualifying investors, it is hard to complain.

In general, "qualified small business stock" is stock in a C corporation acquired by a taxpayer at its original issue if as of the date of issuance such corporation was a "qualified small business," and during substantially all of the taxpayer's holding period for such stock, the corporation met certain active business requirements and was a C corporation. A "qualified small business" in general means a business with less than $50 million in gross assets. The active business requirements require that at least 80 percent (by value) of the assets of the corporation be used by the corporation in the active conduct of 1 or more "qualified trades or businesses."

“Qualified trade or business” means trade or business other than:

  • trades or businesses involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees;
  • any banking, insurance, financing, leasing, investing or similar business;
  • any farming business (including the business of raising or harvesting trees);
  • any business involving the production or extraction of products of a character with respect to a which a deduction is allowable under Section 613 or 613A;and
  • any business of operating a hotel, motel, restaurant or similar business.

The provision as passed:

SEC. 501. TEMPORARY EXCLUSION OF 100 PERCENT OF GAIN ON CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS STOCK.

    (a) In General- Subsection (a) of section 1202 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
      `(4) SPECIAL 100 PERCENT EXCLUSION- In the case of qualified small business stock acquired after March 15, 2010, and before January 1, 2012--
        `(A) paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting `100 percent' for `50 percent',
        `(B) paragraph (2) shall not apply, and
        `(C) paragraph (7) of section 57(a) shall not apply.'.
    (b) Conforming Amendments- Paragraph (3) of section 1202(a) is amended--
      (1) by striking `after the date of the enactment of this paragraph and before January 1, 2011' and inserting `after February 17, 2009, and before March 16, 2010'; and
      (2) by striking `SPECIAL RULES FOR 2009 AND 2010' in the heading and inserting `SPECIAL 75 PERCENT EXCLUSION'.
    (c) Effective Date- The amendments made by this section shall apply to stock acquired after March 15, 2010.

 

Washington State's New Digital Goods Tax

By Michele Radosevich

In the 2009 session, the Washington Legislature mandated big changes in the way that goods and services are taxed if those goods and services are delivered digitally. Under the new law, the notion that the sales and use tax primarily applies to tangible personal property is only a memory. On July 26, 2009, many sellers of internet-based products had to begin collecting sales tax from their customers. However, there is benefit. At the same time, some of these sellers’ business & occupation tax rate was cut by two-thirds, and their basis for apportioning income changed dramatically.

The Department of Revenue is still in the process of writing rules to flesh out the new statute and many details are still unknown. With the exception of digital books, music and videos, the Department recognizes that uncertainty in most situations is the common denominator. Consquently, the Department has said that in the early phases of implementation, it will help businesses comply rather than brow beat them for guessing wrong. Nonetheless, some of the biggest changes are clear.

Many Companies That Formerly Were Considered Service Providers Are Now Retailers and Must Collect Retail Sales Tax.

1.         Digital Goods Providers. The quintessential digital goods are audio and video that is accessed electronically. A frequently cited rationale for the legislation was that when such goods were downloaded, a sales tax applied, whereas when they were merely streamed, no taxable transfer had occurred. This difference was eliminated. However, the legislation applies to far more than audio and video.

Under prior law, the provision of information in digital form was generally considered to be a service. Now sellers of database information, online legal research, financial information, and similar information will be considered retailers, though some sales are exempt from sales tax. 

2.         Digital Service Providers.

Providers of search engines, online gaming, and other services that are performed electronically using one or more software applications are now considered retailers

3.         Providers of Web-based Software.  Providers of web-based software applications, sometimes called “cloud computing” and called “remote access software” in this bill, will also become retailers under the new law. The fact that the provider does not transfer possession of the software does not change the analysis.

4.         Exceptions. The new law is written broadly, but it also contains many exceptions. These can broadly be categorized as (1) exceptions to the definition of digital goods and digital automated services that maintain the current tax classifications for certain businesses, (2) sales tax exemptions that parallel existing law, and (3) sales tax exemptions unique to the new law.

The first category preserves existing tax treatment for certain goods and services. These include telecommunications, online classified advertising, internet access, electronic funds transfer and other automated financial transactions, online educational programs, travel agency services, data processing services, and payment processing services. Charges for allowing another person or entity to sell things on a website are also excluded from retailing, though the underlying sale is not.

Professional services, involving primarily human effort and performed pursuant to a customer request, are excluded from retailing, even if delivered electronically. Examples would include appraisal reports, legal research, and customer website development.

The second category parallels existing sales tax exemptions: 

            a.         If a purchaser incorporates a digital good or service in goods or services that the purchaser markets or otherwise resells, the purchaser is entitled to use a resale certificate or, after January 1, 2010, a reseller’s permit, to avoid the sales tax.

            b.         If an entity makes digital goods or services available for free, no sales tax applies.

            c.         Goods created for a noncommercial purpose or internal use, such as e-mail, are not subject to tax.

            d.         Digital goods may qualify for the manufacturing and equipment exemption from sales tax under the same criteria as any other kind of goods.

The third category exempts certain digital goods and services from sales tax, despite their categorization as retail for B&O purposes:

            a.         Sales of data that is reported in a standardized format and for a business purpose, such as daily reports of stock prices for investment companies, are exempt. The business purpose must be documented with an exemption certificate.

            b.         Sales of electronic versions of newspapers are exempt if the electronic versions share content with the printed newspaper.

            c.         Radio and TV broadcasting is exempt except for pay-per-view programs.

            d.         Sales to entities that will use the digital goods or services both inside and outside Washington are exempt from sales tax, but the purchaser will be liable for use tax on value of the goods or services used in Washington.

The Change in Classification May Reduce B&O Tax for Washington-based Companies.

For the companies that are now reclassified as retailers rather than service providers, the B&O rate will decline from 1.5 percent to 0.471 percent. Just as importantly, the basis for apportioning income for B&O tax will also change from apportionment based on costs to apportionment based on sales. Cost-based apportionment tends to result in a larger amount apportioned to Washington for companies headquartered here. For digital goods and services providers that sell primarily outside the state, the amount of receipts subject to tax in Washington may decline significantly.

The New Law Will Affect Business Transactions.

The new law simply amends the current business and occupation and sales and use tax chapters, rather than creating a new chapter. As part of that existing architecture, there is no hint that business transactions involving digital goods or services would be analyzed any differently than those involving tangible personal property. Superimposing the existing analytical structure on digital goods is likely warranted. Although this sounds simple, there will undoubtedly be problems requiring further guidance from the Department.

Expect Further Changes in the 2010 Session.

The taxation of digital goods and services is a sweeping change that was enacted very quickly. The Department has already identified ambiguities and unintended consequences. Expect a technical corrections bill in 2010.